FirstAlerts

One dead, five injured in Tomah crash involving Amish buggy

A fatal crash on State Highway 131 in Tomah left one person dead and five injured, according to the Monroe County Sheriff's Office.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 8, 2026, 7:07 p.m. ET
A crash on State Highway 131 in , , on September 4, 2026, resulted in one fatality and injuries, according to the . The crash occurred at approximately 3:35 p.m. and involved a 2025 Volkswagen Atlas and an Amish buggy. The driver of the Volkswagen Atlas, who was trapped in her vehicle but later freed, was transported to a hospital and subsequently . Four occupants of the buggy, ranging in age from 18 months to 24 years, sustained serious injuries and remain hospitalized. The driver of the Volkswagen Atlas told authorities she had a sneezing fit just before the accident and did not see the buggy. The road was closed following the crash. The names of those involved have not been , and the investigation is ongoing, with the , State Patrol, DNR, and the Medical Examiner's Office involved. The cause of the crash has not been determined.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 18 Sept 2026, 23:07current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.