FirstAlerts

St. Paul man sentenced in fatal Shepard Road crash after guilty plea

A 2007 Chevrolet Impala and a 1998 GMC Sierra collided on Shepard Road in St. Paul in December 2024, killing an 18-year-old Wisconsin man, according to the Twin Cities Pioneer Press.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 10, 2026, 6:25 p.m. ET
A man has been sentenced in connection with a fatal crash on in , , that killed an 18-year-old man, the Twin Cities Pioneer Press reported. The crash occurred at about 2:30 a.m. on Dec. 29, 2024, and involved a 2007 Chevrolet Impala and a 1998 GMC Sierra, according to the outlet. The driver pleaded guilty in June to criminal vehicular homicide and criminal vehicular operation, the Pioneer Press reported. The outlet reported that the driver's blood-alcohol concentration was 0.23%, above 's legal limit of 0.08%, and that he said he had drunk multiple glasses of wine at home before the crash. The Pioneer Press reported that he crossed over the center lane into oncoming traffic before crashing into the other car. Judge Timothy Mulrooney sentenced the driver to a year in the county workhouse and 10 years of probation, granting a downward departure from state sentencing guidelines that called for a four-year prison term, the Pioneer Press reported. The driver entered a Norgaard plea, stating he could not remember the crash, according to the outlet. The man who died was identified by the Pioneer Press as an 18-year-old graduate of Cochrane-Fountain City High School in western Wisconsin. His passenger, a woman, was conscious and had to be extracted from the car; she had injuries to her hands, face, neck and legs and complained of back and leg pain, the outlet reported. The driver was unconscious with shallow breaths and was rushed to Regions Hospital, where he ended up in a coma, suffered a stroke and was in and out of the hospital for nearly six months, according to the Pioneer Press. The cause of the crash has not been determined. police investigated, the Pioneer Press reported.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 110 Sept 2026, 22:25current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.