FirstAlerts

Two boys killed, teen critically hurt in Clay Highway crash; driver charged

West Virginia State Police say two boys died after a car left Clay Highway and struck a parked front-end loader; the driver faces charges and the case remains open.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 10, 2026, 12:12 a.m. ET
boys, ages seven and 13, died after a car left in , , and struck a parked front-end loader, reported. The crash occurred on August 22, 2026. A 14-year-old boy suffered critical injuries and was transported to CAMC General Hospital, according to . James Neal II, 34, of , who was driving a 2008 GMC Acadia, suffered only minor injuries, the same report states. Neal has been in connection with the crash, WSAZ reports. He was arraigned before a Clay County magistrate, who set his bond at $1,000,000, and he is currently being held at the Central Regional Jail. A charge is not a conviction. The cause of the crash has not been determined. are investigating, and the case remains open and developing.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 110 Sept 2026, 04:12current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.