FirstAlerts

Girl wounded in Tumbler Ridge school attack placed in medically induced coma

The National Post reported that Maya Gebala was taken to BC Children's Hospital in Vancouver on Feb. 10, the day eight other people were killed in the British Columbia town.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 9, 2026, 12:52 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 9, 2026, 11:33 p.m. ET
A young person wounded in the Feb. 10 attack in , , was rushed that day to BC Children's Hospital in Vancouver and placed under a medically induced coma, the National Post reported. The newspaper identified her as Maya Gebala. other people were killed in the rampage, according to the National Post, with much of the shooting at . It was a school day, and students were in classrooms and the school library. In one account the National Post reported that many of the victims were aged between 12 and 13; in another the newspaper described only that students were in classrooms and the library, without giving ages. The National Post reported that the rampage was carried out by 18-year-old Jesse Van Rootselaar. The identities of those killed have not been released in the material available to NewsForge, and officials have not been quoted releasing them. No further details about the condition of others who were hurt have been provided. What led to the attack has not been determined, and no official account of it has been released.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 9, 2026, 12:52 a.m. ETFirst report

    Eight dead after shooting in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., National Post reports

    Eight people were killed in what the National Post described as a murderous rampage in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, on Feb. 10, 2026, with much of the shooting taking place at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School. The figure of eight dead was reported by the National Post. It was a school day, and students were in classrooms and the school library, according to the outlet.

    The National Post reported that Maya Gebala was rushed that day to BC Children's Hospital in Vancouver and placed under a medically induced coma. No other identities of those killed or injured appear in the reporting available.

    This is a developing story. Casualty figures in the hours and days after an attack are commonly revised. No cause or motive has been determined, and no statement from police or other authorities about a line of inquiry is on the record in the material available.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 210 Aug 2026, 03:33current

    Added the officially reported age range of many victims (12–13) as a sourced discrepancy in the National Post's accounts, and a single reference to the named attacker.

  2. Version 19 Aug 2026, 04:52current

    First published.

  3. Version 19 Aug 2026, 04:54

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.