FirstAlerts

Luigi Mangione pleads guilty to federal stalking charge in killing of Brian Thompson

Mangione told a federal court he shot Thompson in Manhattan on the morning of Dec. 4, 2024; a federal judge set sentencing for Dec. 18.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 14, 2026, 4:17 a.m. ETWritten Aug 19, 2026, 8:30 a.m. ET
pleaded guilty Friday to federal stalking charges in the killing of Brian Thompson. Thompson was killed in Midtown on Dec. 4, 2024, according to an ABC7 report. Mangione told the court that he shot Thompson in on the morning of Dec. 4, 2024. That account of the shooting comes from Mangione's own statement in federal court. He remains . A federal judge scheduled sentencing for Dec. 18. Thompson's family attended court and issued a statement following the guilty plea. His name was released by the family. Jamie McDonald, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of , said: "No grievance, political belief or ideological cause can ever justify murder." McDonald also said that "Any person who celebrates, encourages, or excuses actions like these is fundamentally wrong,". The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of and the District Attorney's Office have both handled the case. Mangione was arrested five days after the shooting at a McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania. said Mangione was indicted on first-degree murder charges on Dec. 17, 2024. Federal prosecutors announced separate charges of stalking and murder on Dec. 19, 2024. . The fact set underlying this account gives no description of the setting of the shooting beyond the city and borough, and this story makes no claim about it.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 119 Aug 2026, 12:30current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.