Ryan Kettlewell Named as Man Found Dead in Sheffield Woods
South Yorkshire Police have identified the man found dead in Ecclesall Woods as Ryan Kettlewell, and a suspect is in custody.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 5, 2026, 5:18 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 5, 2026, 5:18 p.m. ETFirst report
Man Found Dead in Sheffield Woods After Shooting, Police Say
The body of Ryan Kettlewell was found in Ecclesall Woods, Sheffield, on Wednesday, September 2, according to South Yorkshire Police. Police said he had been shot. A suspect is in custody.
Detective Chief Inspector Andy Knowles, the senior investigating officer, said: "We are committed to finding answers of how Ryan lost his life." He added: "I continue to urge anyone with information about his death to get in touch, no matter how irrelevant or insignificant you believe it to be, it could be the missing piece we need." Knowles also said: "Our thoughts are with all those who knew and loved Ryan."
The incident is ongoing. Police have asked anyone with information to contact South Yorkshire Police on 101 or via their website.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- 'Lovable character' named after body of man found with gunshot wound in woodsbirminghammail.co.uk
Revision history
- Version 15 Sept 2026, 21:18current
First published.
- Version 15 Sept 2026, 21:24current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.