FirstAlerts

Nine killed in shooting at school in Bang Bua Thong, Thailand

Police said the 14-year-old shooter died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound after a shooting that began at a house before dawn on 7 August and continued at Debsirin Nonthaburi School.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 7, 2026, 9:53 p.m. ETWritten Aug 20, 2026, 6:00 p.m. ET
people were killed and injured in a shooting on 7 August 2026 that ended at in , on the outskirts of Bangkok. The investigation remains open and details may change. A Thai police official said the shooting began at around 5am local time, when a 14-year-old boy killed his grandparents at their two-storey house. According to the police account, the boy's first class of the day began at 8:30am and a second class at :20am; about half an hour into that second class he drew out a gun and began shooting at the school. Police said they received a call about a shooting at :57am, and at around 10:40am found the teenager on the fourth floor, where police said he had turned the gun on himself. Police Colonel Thadsakorn Konthong, superintendent of Police Station, said: "The firearm and the bullets belonged to the grandfather." He said an initial inspection "found signs that the firearm had been searched for inside the grandfather's bedroom". Police Station, Thai police and forensic police responded. No cause or motive has been determined; Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said of the boy, "He was stressed from his studies." Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured. Emergency worker Kiatikhun Verapongpradith described the response: "We were evaluating the sort of weapons he had. Therefore, we could not rush inside. The police then took a team with shields up there." Mr Anutin said: "This is terrible for something like this to happen. I'm sad for those who died and sad for something like this to happen in our country." He added: "As much as possible, we have to create an atmosphere of safety."

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 22:00current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.