Police name five killed in shooting at Louisville's Old National Bank
Police released four names after the April 10, 2023 shooting in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, and Louisville Metro Police named a fifth, Deana Eckert, 57, in an evening tweet. Official wounded figures in the available record differ.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 7, 2026, 11:32 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 7, 2026, 11:54 p.m. ET
Five killed in shooting at Louisville bank, according to conflicting police and investigator accounts
A gunman opened fire on the morning of Monday, April 10, 2023, at Old National Bank in the Preston Pointe building in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, according to reporting by ABC News. It was a routine Monday morning at the bank, ABC News reported; an account executive was in a first-floor conference room for a meeting when the shooting began.
Casualty figures do not agree. Forbes, citing Louisville police, and ABC News, citing investigators, reported five people killed, with ABC News reporting eight wounded; Yahoo News, citing Louisville police, reported four killed and nine injured. Neither account outweighs the other, and the figures may be revised. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or wounded.
Louisville police received the first call at around 8:30 a.m., according to Yahoo News and ABC News citing Louisville police. Officers arrived within three minutes and encountered the shooter, who then began firing at law enforcement, ABC News reported. Craig Collins, a real estate broker with Cushman & Wakefield Commercial Kentucky, told ABC News he heard gunfire at around 8:42 a.m. while in the garage of the building. Police said the suspect, whom they identified as Connor Sturgeon, is deceased, according to ABC News and Forbes.
The Louisville Police Department has established a family reunification center for the victims of the incident, ABC News reported. Louisville police and Louisville Metro Police are among the responding agencies, according to Yahoo News and ABC News. Outlets described the location at different levels of specificity: Yahoo News and ABC News placed the shooting at the venue, while ABC News and Forbes reported it at the level of the city.
No motive has been established, and no explanation for the shooting has been determined on the record in the material available.
Aug 7, 2026, 11:32 p.m. ETFirst report
Four Killed and Nine Injured in Louisville Shooting, Police Say
Four people were killed and nine were injured in a shooting in Louisville, Kentucky, on April 10, 2023, according to figures given by Louisville police and reported by Yahoo News.
Louisville police were among the agencies responding. Officials described the location at the level of a single venue in the city; further details of the setting have not been established in the available account.
Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured. Early casualty counts in incidents of this kind are frequently revised, and the figures above are those attributed to Louisville police in reporting published on April 10.
This report is based on a limited set of verified facts and the situation is developing. No official account of how the shooting unfolded is available here, and nothing has been established about a cause or a motive. Readers should rely on Louisville police for confirmed updates.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Louisville Shooting: 5 Killed By Kentucky Bank Employee, Police Sayforbes.com
- What we know about the Louisville shootingvox.com
- Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear says he lost one of his closest friends in Louisville shootingnews.yahoo.com
- Witnesses describe Louisville shootingnews.yahoo.com
- 'Blood is on me!': Bank employees describe deadly Louisville shooting abcnews.com
- What we know about the Louisville shooting suspectabcnews.com
- Louisville Shooting: 5 Killed By Kentucky Bank Employee, Police Sayforbes.com
- Louisville Shooting: 5 Killed By Kentucky Bank Employee, Police Sayforbes.com
Revision history
- Version 416 Aug 2026, 15:56current
Added the setting of the morning bank meeting and reported the 5-vs-4 death-toll disagreement by outlet; removed sourcing jargon and the unsupported name-spelling variant.
- Version 316 Aug 2026, 14:56
Reported the killed and injured tolls as sourced ranges naming the outlets, added the setting of the bank workday and morning meeting, noted Forbes' report that the deceased were bank employees, removed the weapon and victim-connection passage and the surname discrepancy note, and reduced the suspect to a single naming.
- Version 38 Aug 2026, 03:54current
Added Forbes attribution (citing Louisville police) to the five-killed figure, the suspect's death and the city-level location.
- Version 216 Aug 2026, 14:40
Added the workplace setting and that victims were bank employees, replaced the single tolls with sourced ranges for killed and injured, and added what police said about the suspect's death at the scene.
- Version 28 Aug 2026, 03:42
Added the venue and setting, the 8:30 a.m. first call and three-minute police arrival, the witness account timed at about 8:42 a.m., and the police family reunification center; restructured to lead with what happened rather than the suspect's name.
- Version 116 Aug 2026, 14:29
First published.
- Version 18 Aug 2026, 03:36
First published.
- Version 18 Aug 2026, 03:32current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.