Police say 23 injured in shooting at school in Nonthaburi province, Thailand
The shooting was at Debsirin Nonthaburi School, outside Bangkok. The suspect is dead; the death was self-inflicted.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 316 Aug 2026, 12:54current
Added police figures of five killed and 23 injured from Gulf Daily News as a sourced range against the Daily Star's seven, plus school enrolment, the prime minister's remarks, the self-inflicted manner of the suspect's death, an emergency worker's account and crisis resources.
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 14:55
No new facts; minor wording tightened and headline/dek added.
- Version 17 Aug 2026, 13:08
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.