Two killed, two injured in shooting at Zamboanga university campus
A shooting at Ateneo de Zamboanga University on Tuesday left two people dead and two injured, police and city officials said.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 3, 2026, 3:03 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 3, 2026, 3:03 p.m. ETFirst report
Student killed in shooting at Zamboanga university campus
A high school student shot and killed a fellow student before killing himself Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2026, at the Ateneo de Zamboanga university campus in Zamboanga, according to police and city officials. Two people were injured in the attack, police and city officials said.
Police identified the suspect as Mohammad Mael Jalani, who died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The identities of the victims have not been released.
Police and city officials asked parents and guardians of students to remain calm and follow the high school's advice and arrangements to pick up their children. The incident is no longer active.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Two students dead in Philippines school shooting including gunman, officials saywhbl.com
- Student kills schoolmate and himself in livestreamed Philippine school attack, official saysseattletimes.com
- Philippine student live-streamed fatal school shooting before taking own life, official saycyprus-mail.com
- Two students dead after horror live-streamed shooting at high schooldailystar.co.uk
- Philippines: Student Livestreams School Shootingen.tempo.co
Revision history
- Version 56 Sept 2026, 08:53
Updated to reflect the latest confirmed figures and statements.
- Version 45 Sept 2026, 01:53current
Added Mayor Olaso's statement on class suspension; clarified suspect identity and death; noted conflicting reports on setting.
- Version 34 Sept 2026, 21:23
Added the date and location to the opening paragraph; added the president's statement.
- Version 23 Sept 2026, 20:12
Clarified casualty figures with attribution and noted conflicting reports on the number killed.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 19:03current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 19:08
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.