FirstAlerts
Mass Casualty Incidents

Wiltshire Police respond to reports of catapult use targeting ducks in Devizes

Wiltshire Police have received reports that a group of young males used a catapult to target ducks at The Crammer in Devizes.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 21, 2026, 8:00 a.m. ETWritten Aug 21, 2026, 9:15 a.m. ET
Police have received reports that a group of young males used a catapult to target ducks resting on the water at in . A spokesperson for Police said: "We have recently received concerning reports about the use of a catapult at in . A member of the public reported witnessing a group of young males using a catapult and appearing to target ducks resting on the water." The spokesperson reminded the public that catapults are legal to own and purchase in the UK, but carrying one in a public place without a lawful reason may result in prosecution under the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 if it is considered an offensive weapon. Using a catapult to harm wildlife or damage property may constitute criminal offences, including breaches of animal welfare legislation, the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996, and criminal damage laws. Police have asked parents and guardians to be aware of their children's whereabouts and activities, particularly during the school holidays. They urge anyone witnessing someone actively using a catapult to harm wildlife or putting people at risk to call 999. For non-emergency incidents, information can be reported online via the Police website at .

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 121 Aug 2026, 13:15current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.