Beach Hazards Statement Issued for Benzie and Manistee Counties
The National Weather Service warns of dangerous swimming conditions with waves up to 5 feet from late tonight through Wednesday evening.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 25, 2026, 1:18 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 25, 2026, 1:23 p.m. ET
NWS: Waves up to 5 feet could sweep people off piers in Benzie, Manistee
The National Weather Service in Gaylord, Michigan, warns that waves as high as 3 to 5 feet could sweep people off piers and jetties in Benzie and Manistee counties, creating dangerous swimming conditions.
The Beach Hazards Statement takes effect at 2 a.m. Wednesday, August 26, and expires at 10 p.m. that evening. The Weather Service advises people to remain out of the water to avoid hazardous conditions.
The statement was issued at 1:15 p.m. Tuesday, August 25.
Aug 25, 2026, 1:18 p.m. ETFirst report
Beach Hazards Statement Issued for Benzie and Manistee Counties
The National Weather Service in Gaylord, Michigan, has issued a Beach Hazards Statement for Benzie and Manistee Counties, effective from 2 a.m. to 10 p.m. EDT on Wednesday, August 26, 2026. The statement was issued at 1:15 p.m. EDT on Tuesday, August 25.
According to the advisory, waves as high as 3 to 5 feet will result in dangerous swimming conditions and could sweep people off piers and jetties. The NWS advises residents to remain out of the water to avoid hazardous conditions. The advisory is in effect until 10 p.m. EDT Wednesday, August 26.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 125 Aug 2026, 17:23current
First published.
- Version 125 Aug 2026, 17:18current
First published.
- Version 125 Aug 2026, 17:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.