Extreme Heat Warning Issued as Heat Index Expected to Reach 113
The National Weather Service has upgraded the heat advisory to an Extreme Heat Warning, with heat index values expected to hit 113 this afternoon.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 21, 2026, 5:10 a.m. ET
Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 21, 2026, 5:38 a.m. ET — checked 1h ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 21, 2026, 5:10 a.m. ETFirst report
Extreme Heat Warning Issued as Heat Index Expected to Reach 113
An Extreme Heat Warning has been issued, according to KATC. The heat index is expected to hit 113 this afternoon.
KATC advises residents to drink plenty of water and take as many breaks as needed if they have to spend time outside.
The warning is in effect as of the report published on August 21, 2026.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 09:10current
First published.
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 09:14current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.