Extreme Heat Warning Issued for Eastern Counties as Temperatures Reach 113°
KCBD has issued an Extreme Heat Warning for eastern counties after afternoon highs climbed to 113 degrees.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 24, 2026, 4:42 p.m. ET
Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 24, 2026, 5:09 p.m. ET — checked 1h ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 24, 2026, 4:42 p.m. ETFirst report
Extreme Heat Warning Issued for Eastern Counties as Temperatures Reach 113°
An Extreme Heat Warning has been issued for eastern counties, according to a report from fox34.com. The warning was issued by KCBD as extremely hot afternoon temperatures led to highs as high as 113 degrees.
The warning is in effect for the eastern counties, as reported by fox34.com. The event is still developing, and further details have not been established.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 20:42current
First published.
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 20:47current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.