FirstAlerts

Extreme Heat Warning for North and Central Sebastian, Southern Crawford, Central and Southern Franklin from Noon to 7 PM CDT Wednesday

The National Weather Service warns of dangerously hot conditions with heat index values exceeding 110 degrees from noon to 7 PM CDT Wednesday.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 8, 2026, 1:03 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 1h ago

Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 8, 2026, 2:09 p.m. ET — checked 1h ago.

The National Weather Service in Tulsa has issued an for Wednesday, September 9, 2026, from noon to 7 PM CDT. The covers portions of northwest and west central Arkansas and east central, northeast, and southeast Oklahoma, including the cities of Tulsa, Muskogee, Fort Smith, and others. The will be in effect from noon to 7 PM CDT on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, for zones, including North and Central Sebastian, Southern Crawford, Central and Southern Franklin, Tulsa, Rogers, Mayes, Okmulgee, Wagoner, Muskogee, McIntosh, Haskell, Northern Le Flore, and Central and Southern Sequoyah. Dangerously hot conditions with heat index values in excess of 110 are expected. The National Weather Service advises drinking plenty of fluids, staying in an air-conditioned room, staying out of the sun, and checking on relatives and neighbors. Heat-related illnesses increase significantly during extreme heat and high humidity events.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 18 Sept 2026, 17:03current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.