FirstAlerts

Flood Warning in Effect for Bartholomew IN, Henry IN, Rush IN and Shelby IN Until Saturday Morning

The National Weather Service Indianapolis IN flood warning record covers four central Indiana counties — Bartholomew IN, Henry IN, Rush IN and Shelby IN — and runs until 11:30 AM EDT Saturday.

4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 15, 2026, 5:29 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 15, 2026, 5:59 p.m. ET
A issued by the **** is in effect until **11:30 AM EDT Saturday, August 15, 2026**, according to the record published by that office. The record lists four affected areas: - **Bartholomew IN** - **Henry IN** - **Rush IN** - **Shelby IN** In the record's own geographic description, the covers "Bartholomew County in central Indiana... Rush County in central Indiana... Shelby County in central Indiana... Henry County in east central Indiana." If you are in Bartholomew IN, Henry IN, Rush IN or Shelby IN, this applies to you. The record carries the headline "" and took effect at 11:35 PM EDT on August 14, 2026. On what is happening, the record states: "" It describes the impacts as follows: "" The precautions given in the record are direct: "" The is scheduled to expire at 11:30 AM EDT on August 15, 2026. The full text is carried in the National Weather Service raw product feed.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 15, 2026, 5:56 p.m. ET

    National Weather Service Issues Flood Warning for Four Central Indiana Counties

    The National Weather Service Indianapolis IN has issued a flood warning for Bartholomew, Rush, and Shelby counties in central Indiana, as well as Henry County in east central Indiana. According to official records from the agency, the warning began at 11:35 PM EDT on August 14, 2026, and expires at 11:30 AM EDT on Saturday, August 15, 2026.

    Excessive rainfall has caused ongoing flooding, with streams continuing to rise from earlier rainfall runoff. Official records state that flooding of rivers, creeks, streams, and other low-lying or flood-prone locations is imminent or occurring.

    The agency advises people to turn around rather than drive through flooded roads, noting that most flood deaths occur in vehicles. The record also cautions drivers to be especially careful at night, when flood hazards are more difficult to recognize.

  2. Aug 15, 2026, 5:42 p.m. ET

    National Weather Service Warns of Imminent Flooding and Rising Streams in Four Indiana Counties

    Flooding of rivers, creeks, streams, and other flood-prone low-lying locations is imminent or occurring as streams continue to rise, according to official statements from the National Weather Service office in Indianapolis, Indiana.

    The Flood Warning affects Bartholomew, Rush, and Shelby counties in central Indiana, alongside Henry County in east central Indiana. The warning began at 11:35 PM EDT on August 14, 2026, and expires at 11:30 AM EDT on Saturday, August 15, 2026.

    The National Weather Service advises drivers to turn around rather than drive through flooded roads, noting that most flood deaths occur in vehicles. Official statements also urge motorists to exercise special caution at night, when flooding hazards are significantly harder to see.

  3. Aug 15, 2026, 5:29 p.m. ETFirst report

    Developing Flood Warning Active for Four Central Indiana Counties

    In a developing situation, a Flood Warning remains active for Bartholomew, Henry, Rush, and Shelby counties in Indiana. Official documentation from the National Weather Service Indianapolis IN indicates the warning began at 11:35 PM EDT on August 14, 2026, and is set to expire at 11:30 AM EDT on Saturday, August 15, 2026.

    Flooding caused by excessive rainfall continues across the area. Official bulletins note that streams continue to rise due to excess runoff from earlier rainfall, making the flooding of rivers, creeks, streams, and other low-lying and flood-prone locations imminent or actively occurring.

    The issuing office advises individuals encountering flooded roads to turn around, don't drown, emphasizing that most flood deaths occur in vehicles. Officials urge extra caution at night when recognizing the dangers of flooding is more difficult.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:59current

    First published.

  2. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:42current

    First published.

  3. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:29current

    First published.

  4. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:56current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.