FirstAlerts

Flood Warning in Effect for Boone, Carroll, Clinton and Tippecanoe Counties in Indiana

The National Weather Service Indianapolis IN warning covers Boone IN, Carroll IN, Clinton IN and Tippecanoe IN until 10 AM EDT Sunday, as flooding from excessive rainfall continues.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 15, 2026, 8:27 p.m. ET
Developing

Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.

The has issued a covering four areas in central, north central and west central Indiana. The record lists the affected areas as **Boone IN, Carroll IN, Clinton IN and Tippecanoe IN**. The took effect at 8:18 PM EDT on August 15, 2026, and runs until 1000 AM EDT Sunday — 10:00 AM EDT on August 16, 2026. The official headline on the product reads: "." According to the National Weather Service product issued by the Indianapolis IN office, "" The record describes the covered area as "" On expected impacts, the states: "" **If you are in Boone IN, Carroll IN, Clinton IN or Tippecanoe IN,** the product carries these precautions: "" The is classified at the level and covers one National Weather Service zone grouping. Details in this report come from the National Weather Service product distributed through NOAA's raw data feed.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 116 Aug 2026, 00:27current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.