Flood Warning in Effect for Parts of Greeley and Valley Counties, Nebraska
The warning covers west central Greeley County and southeastern Valley County in central Nebraska until 1000 AM CDT Wednesday.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 7:59 p.m. ET
Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 18, 2026, 8:12 p.m. ET — checked 2h ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 18, 2026, 8:11 p.m. ET
Flood Warning for Greeley and Valley Counties, Nebraska, in Effect Until 10 AM Wednesday
A Flood Warning is in effect for two areas of central Nebraska — listed in the alert record as Greeley NE and Valley NE — according to the flood warning product issued by the National Weather Service Hastings NE.
The warning record describes the affected area as "West Central Greeley County in central Nebraska... Southeastern Valley County in central Nebraska..." The record's own headline reads: "FLOOD WARNING IN EFFECT UNTIL 10 AM CDT WEDNESDAY," and its timing line states the warning runs "Until 1000 AM CDT Wednesday."
The warning was issued and took effect at 2026-08-18T17:06:00-05:00 and expires at 2026-08-19T10:00:00-05:00, according to the same record. The cause given is straightforward: "Flooding caused by excessive rainfall is expected."
On conditions in those two counties, the record states: "Flooding of area creeks, streams, and other low-lying and flood-prone locations continues, particularly along the Mira Creek in and near North Loup. Although excess water continues to gradually recede, it could take several more hours for the Mira Creek to drop back below its minor flood stage."
The National Weather Service Hastings NE record directs residents of the warned area to "Be especially cautious at night when it is harder to recognize the dangers of flooding," to "Be aware of your surroundings and do not drive on flooded roads," and to "Please report observed flooding to local emergency services or law enforcement and request they pass this information to the National Weather Service when you can do so safely."
The alert covers one warning zone and is classified in the record at the warning level — the tier above a watch, meaning flooding is expected rather than possible. Anyone in or traveling through west central Greeley County or southeastern Valley County, including the North Loup area along Mira Creek, is inside the warned area.
Aug 18, 2026, 7:59 p.m. ETFirst report
Flood Warning for Greeley NE and Valley NE in Effect Until 10 AM CDT Wednesday
National Weather Service Hastings NE has issued a Flood Warning covering two areas, listed in the official National Weather Service warning record as Greeley NE and Valley NE. The record describes the affected ground as "West Central Greeley County in central Nebraska... Southeastern Valley County in central Nebraska..."
The warning was issued at 5:06 PM CDT on August 18, 2026, takes effect from that same time, and runs until 10:00 AM CDT Wednesday, August 19, 2026. The record's own headline reads: "FLOOD WARNING IN EFFECT UNTIL 10 AM CDT WEDNESDAY." The stated cause is that "Flooding caused by excessive rainfall is expected." One warning zone is listed.
On conditions, the National Weather Service warning record states: "Flooding of area creeks, streams, and other low-lying and flood-prone locations continues, particularly along the Mira Creek in and near North Loup. Although excess water continues to gradually recede, it could take several more hours for the Mira Creek to drop back below its minor flood stage."
The record's precautions are directed at people in Greeley NE and Valley NE: be especially cautious at night, when it is harder to recognize the dangers of flooding; be aware of your surroundings and do not drive on flooded roads. The National Weather Service also asks that observed flooding be reported to local emergency services or law enforcement, with a request that the information be passed to the National Weather Service, when that can be done safely.
Details in this report come from the National Weather Service warning record issued by National Weather Service Hastings NE, published at https://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/data/raw/.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 00:25
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 00:11current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 23:59current
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 00:21current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.