FirstAlerts

Flood Warning in Effect for Monroe, Muskingum and Noble Counties in Ohio

The National Weather Service warning record covers Monroe County, Ohio; Muskingum County, Ohio; and Noble County, Ohio, and runs until 630 PM EDT Sunday, August 16, 2026.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 16, 2026, 12:09 p.m. ET
Developing

Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.

A is in effect for three counties in east central Ohio, according to the record issued by the . The record names these affected areas: - **Monroe OH** — west central Monroe County in east central Ohio - **Muskingum OH** — southeastern Muskingum County in east central Ohio - **Noble OH** — Noble County in east central Ohio The record's own headline reads: "." The began at 12:05 PM EDT on August 16, 2026, and runs until 630 PM EDT Sunday, ending at 6:30 PM EDT the same day. The National Weather Service record states that Flooding of rivers, creeks, streams, and other low-lying and flood-prone locations is imminent or occurring, the record says, and numerous roads remain closed due to flooding. The record's precautions are directed at drivers in Monroe, Muskingum and Noble counties: "" The was issued as a single zone product by the office, which covers this part of east central Ohio.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 116 Aug 2026, 16:09current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.