FirstAlerts

Flood Warning Issued for Scioto River Near Larue

The National Weather Service warns of minor flooding from this morning to this afternoon.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 21, 2026, 3:23 a.m. ET
Developing · checked 2h ago

Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 21, 2026, 3:39 a.m. ET — checked 2h ago.

The National Weather Service in Cleveland has issued a for the Scioto River near Larue, in effect from 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM EDT on August 21, 2026. At 12.0 feet, flooding occurs in lowland areas south of the Village of La Rue, inundating High Street, Larue Prospect Road, and parts of Vine Street. The was issued at 3:17 AM EDT. The National Weather Service advises: "Turn around, don't drown when encountering flooded roads. Most flood deaths occur in vehicles. Motorists should not attempt to drive around barricades or drive cars through flooded areas." Additional information is available at www.weather.gov/cle. The next statement will be issued this afternoon by 200 PM EDT.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 121 Aug 2026, 07:23current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.