FirstAlerts

Flood Warning Issued for Skunk River at Augusta

The National Weather Service in the Quad Cities forecasts minor flooding from Saturday evening through late Sunday night.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 15, 2026, 10:29 a.m. ET
Developing

Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.

A is in effect for the Skunk River at Augusta, according to a National Weather Service product issued by the agency's Quad Cities IA IL forecast office. The product, dated August 16, 2026, is headlined "" and covers one zone. The states that minor flooding is forecast, The record lists the period as beginning at 9 p.m. Central time on August 15, 2026 and ending at 3 a.m. Central time on August 17, 2026. Under the impacts section, the Weather Service states: "" The agency urges caution when walking near riverbanks and says the next statement will be issued by Sunday morning. This is a developing situation. The remains open, and river conditions may change as the Weather Service issues further statements.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 14:29current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.