FirstAlerts

Flood Warning Issued for White River Near Centerton

The National Weather Service has issued a flood warning for the White River near Centerton as conditions develop.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 6:54 a.m. ET
The has issued an official for the White River near Centerton, where According to official records from August 15, 2026, the covers 1 zone and is in effect The window begins at 9:30 PM on August 14, 2026, and expires at 10:00 AM on August 20, 2026. Official records indicate that at 15.3 feet, extensive flooding of agricultural lands occurs, Blue Bluff and Paragon Roads are impassable, and flood waters affect a few homes in Waverly. The National Weather Service advises motorists not to attempt to drive around barricades or drive cars through flooded areas, reminding drivers to turn around, don't drown when encountering flooded roads as most flood deaths occur in vehicles. Additional information is available at www.weather.gov/ind, and the next statement is scheduled to be issued late tonight by around 345 AM EDT.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 10:54current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.