FirstAlerts

Flood Watch for Clearfield, Northern Centre, Cambria, Blair Until 2 AM EDT Sunday

The National Weather Service warns of possible flash flooding from excessive rainfall in central Pennsylvania on Saturday, August 22, 2026.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 22, 2026, 5:20 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 22, 2026, 5:23 p.m. ET
The National Weather Service in State College PA has issued a for portions of central Pennsylvania, including Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, and Northern Centre counties. The is in effect from 5:12 PM EDT Saturday, August 22, 2026, According to the Weather Service, excessive runoff may result in flooding of rivers, creeks, streams, and other low-lying and flood-prone locations. Flooding may also occur in poor drainage and urban areas. Residents should monitor later forecasts and be prepared to take action should Flash Flood Warnings be issued.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 22, 2026, 5:20 p.m. ETFirst report

    Flood Watch Issued for Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, and Northern Centre Counties Until 2 AM EDT Sunday

    The National Weather Service in State College, Pennsylvania, has issued a Flood Watch for portions of central Pennsylvania, effective from 5:12 PM EDT Saturday, August 22, 2026, until 2:00 AM EDT Sunday, August 23, 2026. The watch covers Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, and Northern Centre counties, including the cities of Clearfield, DuBois, Johnstown, Philipsburg, and Altoona.

    According to the National Weather Service, flash flooding caused by excessive rainfall is possible. Excessive runoff may result in flooding of rivers, creeks, streams, and other low-lying and flood-prone locations, as well as in poor drainage and urban areas. Residents are advised to monitor later forecasts and be prepared to take action should Flash Flood Warnings be issued.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 122 Aug 2026, 21:23current

    First published.

  2. Version 122 Aug 2026, 21:20current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.