Flood Watch Extended for North of Yuma, Including Quartzsite, Through Monday, August 31, 2026
The Flood Watch for areas north of Yuma, including Quartzsite, has been extended to 8 p.m. Monday, August 31, 2026, according to KYMA.
4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 31, 2026, 7:13 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 31, 2026, 7:20 p.m. ET
Flood Warning Issued for Area North of Quartzsite as Watch Expires
A Flood Warning is in effect until 6:45 PM for a severe and destructive storm just north of Quartzsite, according to KYMA. The warning comes as a Flood Watch, issued for areas north of Yuma including Quartzsite, remains in effect until 8 PM Monday, August 31, 2026.
KYMA urges residents to "TURN AROUND, DON'T DROWN" and to be safe. The Flood Watch was previously reported by KYMA as covering north of Yuma and Quartzsite until 8 PM.
Aug 31, 2026, 7:16 p.m. ET
Flood Watch for North of Yuma, Including Quartzsite, Until Monday, August 31, 2026, Evening
A Flood Watch is in effect for areas north of Yuma, including Quartzsite, until 8 p.m. Monday, August 31, 2026, according to KYMA. The watch is part of a warning for a severe and destructive storm just north of Quartzsite, with a Flood Warning in effect until 6:45 p.m. KYMA urges residents to "TURN AROUND, DON'T DROWN."
Aug 31, 2026, 7:13 p.m. ETFirst report
Flood Watch Issued for North of Yuma, Including Quartzsite, Until Monday Evening
A Flood Watch is in effect until 8 p.m. Monday for areas north of Yuma, including Quartzsite, according to KYMA. The watch was reported on August 31, 2026.
KYMA also reports a Flood Warning until 6:45 p.m. for a severe and destructive storm just north of Quartzsite. Officials urge residents to "TURN AROUND, DON'T DROWN."
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 23:22current
First published.
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 23:16current
First published.
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 23:13current
First published.
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 23:20current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.