Freeze Warning for South Central Siskiyou County and Other Areas in California and Oregon Through 9 AM Monday
The National Weather Service warns of widespread frost and temperatures as low as 29 degrees across parts of California and Oregon, including South Central Siskiyou County, until 9 AM PDT Monday.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 6, 2026, 1:12 p.m. ET
Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 6, 2026, 1:39 p.m. ET — checked 1h ago.
Earlier reports
Sep 6, 2026, 1:12 p.m. ETFirst report
Freeze Warning for South Central Siskiyou, Modoc, and Other Areas Until 9 AM PDT Monday
The National Weather Service in Medford, Oregon has issued a Freeze Warning for areas of Northern California and Southern Oregon, in effect from 3 AM to 9 AM PDT Monday, September 7, 2026. The warning is in effect until 9 AM PDT Monday. The warning covers South Central Siskiyou County, Northeast Siskiyou and Northwest Modoc Counties, and Modoc County in California, as well as the Klamath Basin, Northern and Eastern Klamath County and Western Lake County, and Central and Eastern Lake County in Oregon. Affected communities include Klamath Falls, Lakeview, Alturas, McCloud, Dorris, Tulelake, Chiloquin, and Sprague River.
Widespread frost and sub-freezing temperatures as low as 29 degrees are expected. The warning states that frost and freeze conditions could kill crops and other sensitive vegetation and possibly damage unprotected outdoor plumbing. The National Weather Service advises taking steps now to protect tender plants from the cold.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 17:24current
First published.
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 17:12current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.