Heat Advisory Issued for Briscoe, Hall, Childress and Surrounding Counties as Temperatures Reach 109
Official National Weather Service Lubbock TX records warn that hot temperatures could cause heat illness across 12 Texas zones on Thursday.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 11:07 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 20, 2026, 11:07 a.m. ETFirst report
Heat Advisory Issued for Southeastern Texas Panhandle and Rolling Plains
According to official records from the National Weather Service Lubbock TX, a heat advisory was issued at 10:31 PM CDT on August 19, 2026, for August 20, 2026. The advisory window starts at 1:00 PM CDT on Thursday, August 20, 2026, and expires at 8:00 PM CDT on August 20, 2026.
Official records state that temperatures up to 109 degrees are expected in the far southeastern Texas Panhandle and the Rolling Plains. The advisory covers 12 zones, including the areas of Briscoe, Hall, Childress, Floyd, Motley, Cottle, Crosby, Dickens, King, Garza, Kent, and Stonewall. Specific cities included are Post, Lockney, Memphis, Silverton, Matador, Floydada, Quitaque, Aspermont, Dickens, Spur, Turkey, Kirkland, Paducah, Jayton, Childress, Roaring Springs, Guthrie, Ralls, Cee Vee, Crosbyton, Lake Alan Henry, Old Glory, and Dumont.
According to the official record, hot temperatures may cause heat illnesses. Precautions listed by the weather service include drinking plenty of fluids, staying in an air-conditioned room, staying out of the sun, and checking up on relatives and neighbors.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 15:17current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 15:07current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 15:54
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.