FirstAlerts

Heat Advisory in Force for Columbia, Aiken and Sumter as Heat Index Nears 109

An advisory covering 17 zones across central South Carolina and east central Georgia runs until 8 p.m. tonight and returns from 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday, the National Weather Service Columbia SC says.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 17, 2026, 4:54 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 15h ago

Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 17, 2026, 6:41 p.m. ET — checked 15h ago.

A is in force across zones of central South Carolina and east central Georgia, including Columbia, Richmond, Burke, Aiken and Sumter, according to the record issued by the for August 18, 2026 and posted to the agency's raw text product feed. Heat index values up to 109 are expected both this afternoon and Tuesday afternoon, the record states. The alert is classified at the level. The record gives two windows: "" The weather service's own alert headline reads: "." The second window begins at 11:00 a.m. EDT and ends at 8:00 p.m. EDT. The zones listed in the record are Columbia, Richmond, Burke, Chesterfield, Kershaw, Lexington, Richland, Lee, Aiken, Sumter, Barnwell, Calhoun, Clarendon, Bamberg, Northwestern Orangeburg, Central Orangeburg and Southeastern Orangeburg. Cities named as covered are Orangeburg, Eutawville, Batesburg-Leesville, Lexington, Denmark, Pageland, Columbia, Branchville, Manning, Bamberg, Lugoff, Sumter, Bowman, North, Barnwell, Elloree, Cheraw, Santee, St. Matthews, Camden, Waynesboro, Red Bank, Cayce, Blackville and Aiken. Hot temperatures and high humidity may cause heat illnesses, the states in the . Recommended precautions include taking extra precautions when outside, wearing lightweight and loose fitting clothing, and limiting strenuous activities to early morning or evening. The agency advises taking action when symptoms of heat exhaustion and heat stroke appear, and warns against leaving young children and pets in unattended vehicles because car interiors will reach lethal temperatures in a matter of minutes.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 117 Aug 2026, 20:54current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.