FirstAlerts

Heat Advisory Issued for Monroe and Five Surrounding Counties

A heat advisory takes effect August 27, 2018, with heat index values expected to reach up to 100 degrees.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 7:00 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 27, 2018, 8:01 a.m. ETWritten Aug 19, 2026, 8:29 p.m. ET
The has issued a for Monroe, Ontario, Livingston, Orleans, Wayne, and northern Cayuga counties, reported the Democrat & Chronicle. The begins at 12:00 PM on August 27, 2018, and expires at 8:00 PM on August 28, 2018. According to the Democrat & Chronicle, temperatures are expected to reach 87 degrees on Monday, August 27, with the heat index likely reaching the mid-90s. On Tuesday, August 28, projected high temperatures top 90 degrees but will feel like 100 degrees with the heat index.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 19, 2026, 7:00 p.m. ETFirst report

    Heat Advisory Issued for Monroe, Ontario, Livingston and Three Other Counties

    The National Weather Service in Buffalo has issued a heat advisory for Monroe, Ontario, Livingston, Orleans, Wayne, and northern Cayuga counties on August 27, 2018, according to reporting by the Democrat and Chronicle.

    The heat advisory starts at 12:00 p.m. on August 27, 2018, and expires at 8:00 p.m. on August 28, 2018.

    Temperatures are expected to reach 87 degrees on Monday, with heat index values likely reaching the mid-90s, reported the Democrat and Chronicle. Tuesday's projected high tops 90 degrees but will feel more like 100 with the heat index.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 119 Aug 2026, 23:00current

    First published.

  2. Version 120 Aug 2026, 00:29current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.