FirstAlerts

Heat Advisory for North and Central Sebastian, Southern Crawford, Central and Southern Franklin Until 8 PM CDT Tuesday

The National Weather Service warns of heat index values up to 107 degrees from noon to 8 PM CDT Tuesday for parts of Arkansas and Oklahoma.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 31, 2026, 12:32 p.m. ET
The National Weather Service in Tulsa has issued a for Tuesday, September 1, 2026, from noon to 8 PM CDT. The is in effect until 8 PM CDT Tuesday. It covers North and Central Sebastian, Southern Crawford, and Central and Southern Franklin counties in Arkansas, and Washington, Nowata, Tulsa, Rogers, Mayes, Wagoner, and Southeast Osage counties in Oklahoma. Heat index values up to 107 degrees are expected. The warns that heat-related illnesses are possible, especially for those not acclimated to the conditions or those performing strenuous activities. Residents are advised to take extra precautions when outside, wear lightweight and loose-fitting clothing, limit strenuous activities to early morning or evening, and take action when seeing symptoms of heat exhaustion and heat stroke. The was issued at 11:25 AM CDT on Monday, August 31, 2026.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 131 Aug 2026, 16:32current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.