FirstAlerts

Heat Advisory in Effect for Choctaw and Pushmataha Counties Friday

The National Weather Service has issued a Heat Advisory from noon to 8 PM CDT Friday for parts of southeastern Oklahoma.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 1:23 p.m. ET
The National Weather Service in Tulsa has issued a for Choctaw and Pushmataha Counties in southeastern Oklahoma, in effect from noon to 8 PM CDT on Friday, August 21, 2026. The warns of heat index values up to 108 degrees. The covers the cities of Antlers, Clayton, and Hugo. According to the , heat-related illnesses increase significantly during extreme heat and high humidity events, and are possible especially for those not acclimated to the conditions or performing strenuous activities. Residents are advised to drink plenty of fluids, stay in an air-conditioned room, stay out of the sun, and check on relatives and neighbors. The recommends wearing lightweight and loose-fitting clothing, limiting strenuous activities to early morning or evening, and taking action when seeing symptoms of heat exhaustion and heat stroke. The is in effect until 8 PM CDT Friday, August 21, 2026.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 17:23current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.