FirstAlerts

Heat Advisory Thursday for St. Francis, Tate and Panola Counties, Heat Index to 108

Batesville, Forrest City and Senatobia are among the cities covered from 11 AM to 8 PM CDT on Aug. 20.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 19, 2026, 5:38 p.m. ET
A takes effect at 11 AM CDT Thursday, Aug. 20, 2026, and expires at 8 PM CDT the same day for St. Francis County in Arkansas and Panola and Tate counties in Mississippi, according to the product issued by the and distributed through NOAA's raw weather bulletin feed. The product, issued at 11:25 AM CDT on Aug. 19, 2026, covers zones. Cities in the area include Batesville, Forrest City, and Senatobia. The record states that heat index values up to 108 are expected under the . It also describes an Extreme Heat Warning, with dangerously hot conditions and heat index values up to 112, in force until 8 PM CDT this evening. "Heat related illnesses increase significantly during extreme heat and high humidity events," the says. "Hot temperatures and high humidity may cause heat illnesses." The weather service advises people to

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 119 Aug 2026, 21:38current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.