High Surf Advisory Issued for Big Island Southeast Through Thursday Morning
The National Weather Service has issued a high surf advisory for Big Island Southeast, warning of dangerous swimming conditions.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 1:17 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 2, 2026, 1:21 p.m. ET
High Surf Advisory: Dangerous Swimming Conditions Expected on Southeast Big Island
The National Weather Service in Honolulu has issued a High Surf Advisory for the southeast coast of the Big Island, warning that strong breaking waves and strong currents will make swimming dangerous. The advisory is in effect from 7:06 a.m. HST Wednesday, September 2, until 6 a.m. HST Thursday, September 3.
Surf heights are expected to rise to 7 to 10 feet today. The advisory covers the Big Island Southeast area. The Weather Service advises the public to heed all advice from ocean safety officials and notes, "When in doubt, don't go out."
Sep 2, 2026, 1:17 p.m. ETFirst report
High Surf Advisory Issued for Big Island Southeast Until Thursday Morning
The National Weather Service in Honolulu has issued a High Surf Advisory for Big Island Southeast, effective from 7:06 a.m. HST on Wednesday, September 2, 2026, until 6 a.m. HST Thursday, September 3, 2026.
The advisory warns of surf heights rising to 7 to 10 feet, which will produce strong breaking waves and strong currents, making swimming dangerous. The advisory is rated as moderate impact.
Officials advise the public to heed all advice from ocean safety officials and to stay out of the water when in doubt.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 17:21current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 17:17current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 17:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.