FirstAlerts

High Surf Advisory: Strong Waves and Currents to Make Swimming Dangerous on Big Island's West Shores

The National Weather Service warns that strong breaking waves and currents will make swimming dangerous along west-facing shores of the Big Island through midnight HST tonight.

2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 8, 2026, 9:22 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 8, 2026, 9:23 p.m. ET
The National Weather Service in Honolulu has issued a for west-facing shores of the Big Island, warning that strong breaking waves and strong currents will make swimming dangerous. The , issued at 3:15 p.m. HST on September 8, 2026, is in effect until midnight HST tonight, September 9, 2026. The covers the Kona and Kohala areas, where large breaking waves of 6 to 8 feet are expected, becoming 4 to 6 feet later tomorrow morning. The National Weather Service advises the public to heed all advice from ocean safety officials and notes, "When in doubt, don't go out."

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 8, 2026, 9:22 p.m. ETFirst report

    High Surf Advisory Issued for West Facing Shores of the Big Island

    The National Weather Service in Honolulu has issued a High Surf Advisory for west facing shores of the Big Island, effective until midnight HST tonight (September 9, 2026). The advisory covers the Kona and Kohala areas.

    Large breaking waves of 6 to 8 feet are expected, becoming 4 to 6 feet later tomorrow morning. The advisory warns of moderate impacts, with strong breaking waves and strong currents making swimming dangerous.

    Officials advise the public to heed all advice from ocean safety officials and to stay out of the water when in doubt.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 19 Sept 2026, 01:23current

    First published.

  2. Version 19 Sept 2026, 01:22current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.