Red Flag Warning Issued for Surprise Valley, Eastern Lassen County, Northern Washoe County
The National Weather Service has issued a Red Flag Warning for August 22, 2026, from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. PDT.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 21, 2026, 10:41 a.m. ET
Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. ET — checked 43 min ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 21, 2026, 10:41 a.m. ETFirst report
Red Flag Warning Issued for Surprise Valley, Eastern Lassen County, Northern Washoe County
The National Weather Service in Reno has issued a Red Flag Warning for Surprise Valley in California, Eastern Lassen County, and Northern Washoe County, effective from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. on August 22, 2026. The warning was issued at 7:37 a.m. on August 21 and covers four zones. The warning expires at 11 p.m. Pacific Time on August 22, 2026.
Residents are advised to avoid outdoor activities that could create sparks near dry vegetation, such as yard work, target shooting, or campfires. They should follow local fire restrictions and check weather.gov/reno for updates and livingwithfire.info for preparedness tips.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 14:41current
First published.
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 14:53current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.