Wind Advisory Issued for Four East Texas Counties Through 1 PM Wednesday
The National Weather Service has issued a Wind Advisory for Cherokee, Nacogdoches, Angelina, and San Augustine Counties, effective from 7 PM Tuesday to 1 PM Wednesday.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 1, 2026, 11:12 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 1, 2026, 11:18 a.m. ET
Wind Advisory for Cherokee, Nacogdoches, Angelina Counties Until 1 PM Wednesday
The National Weather Service in Shreveport, Louisiana, has issued a Wind Advisory for Angelina, Nacogdoches, San Augustine, and Cherokee Counties, effective from 7 PM CDT Tuesday, September 1, 2026, to 1 PM CDT Wednesday, September 2, 2026. The advisory expires at 1 PM CDT Wednesday.
The advisory warns of southeast winds of 20 to 30 mph with gusts up to 40 mph. According to the Weather Service, these winds could blow around unsecured objects, and tree limbs may be downed, possibly causing a few power outages. The advisory also cautions that driving could be difficult, especially for high-profile vehicles, and advises extra caution.
The advisory was issued at 10:07 AM CDT on September 1, 2026.
Sep 1, 2026, 11:12 a.m. ETFirst report
Wind Advisory Issued for East Texas Counties
The National Weather Service in Shreveport, Louisiana, has issued a Wind Advisory for Angelina, Nacogdoches, San Augustine, and Cherokee Counties in East Texas. The advisory is in effect from 7 PM CDT Tuesday, September 1, 2026, until 1 PM CDT Wednesday, September 2, 2026, when it expires.
Southeast winds of 20 to 30 mph with gusts up to 40 mph are expected. According to the advisory, gusty winds will blow around unsecured objects, and tree limbs could be blown down, possibly causing a few power outages. The advisory also notes that winds this strong can make driving difficult, especially for high-profile vehicles, and urges extra caution.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 15:18current
First published.
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 15:12current
First published.
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 15:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.