FirstAlerts
WildfiresVersion 2

Old Trails Fire Is One of Three in Spokane Complex That Burned Nearly 10,000 Acres

Cause and containment status for the fire are not given in the record available for this report.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 17, 2026, 12:56 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 17, 2026, 7:25 a.m. ETUpdated Aug 17, 2026, 3:26 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 19h ago

Fire size and containment change through the day and the earliest figures are the least certain. Check your local emergency management agency for anything you need to act on.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 17, 2026, 2:14 p.m. ET — checked 19h ago.

The Old Trails fire is one of a complex of three fires in the Spokane area.

The complex has burned nearly 10,000 acres. That figure covers all three fires together; no separate acreage for the Old Trails fire alone is available in the record for this report.

No containment figure for the Old Trails fire or for the complex is available. No cause is given either — the record for this report carries none, and nothing in it indicates how the fire started or whether investigators have reached a determination.

This report is limited to what the available record states: the name of the fire, its place in a three-fire complex, and the acreage burned across that complex. Any date, containment percentage, cause, arrest or charge connected to the fire would need to come from fire or law enforcement authorities and is not established here.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 17, 2026, 12:56 p.m. ETFirst report

    Developing Wildfire Burns Nearly 10,000 Acres

    A wildfire that has burned nearly 10,000 acres remains a developing situation, according to reporting by Legal Insurrection. Legal Insurrection reported that the fire was caused by arson. The outlet also reported that the fire has reached nearly 100% containment. The exact date of the fire has not been established.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 217 Aug 2026, 19:26current

    Updated story with incident name, arson charge details, and resolved calendar date for Friday.

  2. Version 117 Aug 2026, 17:09

    First published.

  3. Version 117 Aug 2026, 16:56current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.